Post by PurpleFloyd on Nov 20, 2023 14:25:01 GMT -6
Once again you are incorrect. I know Kirk has flaws and if they happen to find a QB who is better I have a long history of saying we should replace him with that player.
However there are too many fans who think we can just flick a switch and replace his productivity when we haven’t had the kind of long term stability we have had with him in a couple decades since Culpepper was here. And before that you have to go back to Tarkenton.
And all week those who are the most against Kirk were all in on Dobbs being the answer. Last night showed us why mobility isn’t always a benefit. Especially when you panic under pressure and throw the ball up for grabs multiple times. We haven’t seen that since Tarvaris Jackson.
Mobility is still a big benefit and you could still see that last night. It's just that Dobbs isn't nearly as good of a thrower as you get at and that will hold him back. I also specifically said the other day I hope we don't pay up for Dobbs either and that what we saw those first two games likely wasn't sustainable. So I don't think that is true, as I said many just want to run with cheaper options at the QB position so we can focus on building up the rest of the roster and getting our cap situation fixed.
It didn’t put us in a hole. That’s just dumb and really doesn’t warrant a response.
“Isn’t as good of a thrower “
Welp, that’s actually what I want a QB to be good at.