Post by whoskmoon on Jul 8, 2020 7:24:43 GMT -6
Teddy had all the intangibles that when he eventually developed into the QB he looked like he was becoming, would have been the difference in wins and losses while he also put up great numbers. Wilson, Mahomes, Rodgers, Brees and Brady have the intangibles and the stats. That is what you need to win it all. Great stats on top of the intangibles. Without it you can win 10 or 11 games here or there, but you are never going to be able to take the next step without a lot going your way.
Cousins is an empty stat sheet. Great against crap teams we don't necessarily need great against, crap against great ones. He was terrible when pressured when we played the Bears, Packers, KC, and SF, but when he played the likes of Washington, NY, Detroit and Denver, he was fantastic against pressure. Now let me ask you something, does him being good against pressure against bad teams matter in the end? We saw the games, we know what he does when pressured when facing good teams and have read countless articles from fan boys who claim that is why he failed in those games. The pressure narrative is one from the Cousins apologist just as much as the people who would be happier with a different QB.
Wait a minute, if he is actually good against pressure, it must not have been the line and just him having a bad game against GB X 2, Chicago, KC and SF. All this time people have been saying it was the Oline, yet now we know the truth, it is Cousins and it doesn't matter if we improve the line, he will still suck in those types of games.
Wait a minute, if he is actually good against pressure, it must not have been the line and just him having a bad game against GB X 2, Chicago, KC and SF. All this time people have been saying it was the Oline, yet now we know the truth, it is Cousins and it doesn't matter if we improve the line, he will still suck in those types of games.
5. Kirk Cousins
UNDER PRESSURE: 91.5 passer rating, +3.8% completion rate above expectation, 58.1% completion rate.
Cousins was a stud under pressure in the earliest years of NGS tracking, which helped destroy a narrative of him being average at the absolute best. But thanks to a play-action offense built out of an emphatic rushing attack led by Dalvin Cook, Cousins doesn't face as much pressure as he once did. Even with that considered, he still lands in the top five of most under-pressure metrics. His passer rating under pressure was fifth-best, his completion percentage under pressure was fourth-best and his completion percentage above expectation while pressured was also in the top five. You won't often see Cousins' name mentioned among the Aaron Rodgers and Patrick Mahomes of the league, but he has the numbers to back it up.
UNDER PRESSURE: 91.5 passer rating, +3.8% completion rate above expectation, 58.1% completion rate.
Cousins was a stud under pressure in the earliest years of NGS tracking, which helped destroy a narrative of him being average at the absolute best. But thanks to a play-action offense built out of an emphatic rushing attack led by Dalvin Cook, Cousins doesn't face as much pressure as he once did. Even with that considered, he still lands in the top five of most under-pressure metrics. His passer rating under pressure was fifth-best, his completion percentage under pressure was fourth-best and his completion percentage above expectation while pressured was also in the top five. You won't often see Cousins' name mentioned among the Aaron Rodgers and Patrick Mahomes of the league, but he has the numbers to back it up.
I don't believe all/most of his stats come from playing bad teams. But if you're going to suggest that all of the time, are you also holding the same standards to other QBs? When they have positive stats, do you automatically think it's because of their own abilities or is it because they've likely played a lot of bad teams? How deeply do you dive into these things? I'm genuinely curious. Admittedly, I take most of these pieces at face value, because I believe they're using the same criteria for everyone and doing so without biases. The numbers/rankings are what they are. No more, no less. Do we sometimes need to dive in deeper? Sure. But do we always have to assume the worst about Cousins? Probably not.
I don't believe all of his stats come from just bad teams, bad defenses in particular, but most of his positive numbers do. How many great passes under pressure did he have against Chicago? GB X 2? KC? SF?
How about Detroit X 2, Philly,Washington, LA and NY? If Cousins had a 60 passer rating in that first set of games with a rusher in his face, and a 120 under the same conditions in that second set, would his overall passer rating be favorable? What would that pattern tell you about your chances in the playoffs, when you are almost certainly going to face a good defense or two?
This isn't just true with the pressure stat either. He feasts on bad defenses and struggles against good ones. More consistently than any QB I have seen in memory.
QBs like Derick Carr for instance do something similar, but not even close to the level that Cousins does.