Post by Drank on Jan 4, 2024 13:13:09 GMT -6
I don't disagree that it's not easy. But guess what, KOC had 3 tools, Mullens, Dobbs, and Hall. And that is his job. Hall was a developmental prospect that was never supposed to play. I get that part. Mullens was hurt which forced his hand. I get that part too. Mullens is a true backup in that he's Kirk lite, but he's also a turnover machine, so KOC still has to scale down the offense to reduce that. Did he?
Dobbs got first crack effectively and did something that none of those 3 did and that was put up nearly 30 points in two games when he didn't know the offense and things were forced to be scaled back. What did KOC do? He tried to turn Dobbs into Kirk. KOC literally stumbled on to a system that worked for Dobbs that no one else found that worked. It's not that teams adjusted. KOC adjusted and tried to fit the tool he had into the system he had built. Could this have worked for a dozen games? I don't know. But KOC also tried to do what everyone else tried to do and failed... force Dobbs into their system.
Fair but then I say this. If it was clear that they fail then why bring them in? Again decisions and that’s what my fuss is all about.
Surely KO didn’t bring in guys he knows will fail. No he brought them in because he felt he could work with them. Regardless how you slice it the arrow points back too KO and KAM. Again I’m still hoping they the ones but questions are understandable at the moment subject to change based on results.