What if it really was all Zimmer's fault?
May 26, 2022 14:33:32 GMT -6
Reignman and Josey Wales like this
Post by Jor-El on May 26, 2022 14:33:32 GMT -6
The narrative around the team lately has been of a particular attitude: that the same personnel we have seen in recent years, with a few modest changes (around the level Spielman generally added each offseason) will have far better results.
We're putting Dalvin out at WR sometimes and he'll be far more productive!
Run far more sets with 3 or more WRs and we'll get more big plays!
With a QB-friendly HC, Cousins will thrive like Matthew Stafford did!
Garrett Bradbury can be a good C with the right coaching!
Hunter will be better in a 3-4 than ever before! (So will Tomlinson and Watts and others)
Ed Donatell's coverage schemes will make our CBs play just fine!
O'Connell will have the success of Matt Lafleur and Zac Taylor!
In other words: all we needed to do was dump Mike Zimmer. Well, many of you know I was done with Zimmer for 4 years, even doubted him when the 2016 collapse happened (but was sucked back in for a while in 2017), so I'm not going to disagree with the general approach. But if fixing this team was as simple as running some 4-WR sets and playing Danielle Hunter as a rush OLB...and Mike Zimmer was too stupid or stubborn to realize that...then he was a pretty incompetent coach, wasn't he?
But that begs the bigger meta-question: IF Zimmer (and his coaching staff) was the only problem with the Vikings...why would we expect smart football decisions from the owners who took 8 years to figure that out? If we had new ownership, you could buy into the idea that the last owners were stupid and the new ones were smart. But we have the same owners.
I think the idea that O'Connell is going to thrive immediately, that this team will suddenly win +12 games with most of the same players, is just marketing meant to keep fans interested. It's more reasonable that the team will need a year or two of extensively improving the roster, and we're going to see a LOT of garbage collected by Spielman on the waiver wire, even if they just have to replace them with other scrubs or raw prospects (who fit the new coaches' system). But if I'm wrong, if the Vikings have a winning year and it's true these same players just needed better coaching...were the Wilfs actually that blind for half a decade, and who gave them a sudden brain transplant??
We're putting Dalvin out at WR sometimes and he'll be far more productive!
Run far more sets with 3 or more WRs and we'll get more big plays!
With a QB-friendly HC, Cousins will thrive like Matthew Stafford did!
Garrett Bradbury can be a good C with the right coaching!
Hunter will be better in a 3-4 than ever before! (So will Tomlinson and Watts and others)
Ed Donatell's coverage schemes will make our CBs play just fine!
O'Connell will have the success of Matt Lafleur and Zac Taylor!
In other words: all we needed to do was dump Mike Zimmer. Well, many of you know I was done with Zimmer for 4 years, even doubted him when the 2016 collapse happened (but was sucked back in for a while in 2017), so I'm not going to disagree with the general approach. But if fixing this team was as simple as running some 4-WR sets and playing Danielle Hunter as a rush OLB...and Mike Zimmer was too stupid or stubborn to realize that...then he was a pretty incompetent coach, wasn't he?
But that begs the bigger meta-question: IF Zimmer (and his coaching staff) was the only problem with the Vikings...why would we expect smart football decisions from the owners who took 8 years to figure that out? If we had new ownership, you could buy into the idea that the last owners were stupid and the new ones were smart. But we have the same owners.
I think the idea that O'Connell is going to thrive immediately, that this team will suddenly win +12 games with most of the same players, is just marketing meant to keep fans interested. It's more reasonable that the team will need a year or two of extensively improving the roster, and we're going to see a LOT of garbage collected by Spielman on the waiver wire, even if they just have to replace them with other scrubs or raw prospects (who fit the new coaches' system). But if I'm wrong, if the Vikings have a winning year and it's true these same players just needed better coaching...were the Wilfs actually that blind for half a decade, and who gave them a sudden brain transplant??