Post by vikecycle on Oct 15, 2020 15:06:19 GMT -6
They were without their starting G and starting T and didnt miss a beat. They have had a top rated O line week in week out.
They were without there starting NT just like us, but yet, they didnt miss a beat. They have a better D then us.
They also were without the top two WRS, didnt miss a beat... on pace to be the best O in history.
Even the places where they were injured, O line, WR, D line, etc. they still completely outplay us at those spots.
How can injuries be the difference between us and 4-1, when the Packers have more injuries then us and are 4-0?
Yes, not every player on this team is atrocious, who cares? I can find an equally long list of not atrocious players on any team in the league. (Except maybe the Jets lol)
Sorry, I know delusion is a hell of a drug, but handful of players isnt the difference between 1-4 and 4-1.
Rodgers is one of the best QBs in the league. Hes a first ballot hall of Famer and is playing like one. He can mask a LOT of deficiencies. Its not a fair comparison. Their defense gave up 30+ points in 3 or their 4 games but they can outscore people.
Yes, the vikings would be 3-2 or 4-1 if they had pierce, hunter, a 3T and 2 competent guards.
Their D gave up 30 in just two games so far, but why is there D better then ours without their starting NT? Why is the O line better then ours while being significantly more injured?
When we compare areas of the teams in a vacuum outside of the QB position, they are still easily outplaying us.
This is just a weak excuse. GB is better then us nearly everywhere, and woth more injuries, that cant be entirely upon the QB.