Hey Viking fans

Indeed, next year is all that matters, and I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, bravado and chest thumping in regards to our division rival is wholly unjustified.

You can throw 2014 out the window too, Zims 1st year, he was just starting to build the z-fense. I mean if we get to ignore Rodgers 1st few years, then we can cherry pick too. We beat them 4 of the last 5. The only loss came when the DB's decided to go rogue at Lambeau in 2016.

But yeah, going forward I think the Pukers are little more worried about us than we are of them. They know their team is a mess right now and that everything hinges on Rodgers staying healthy. 2 broken collarbones in 4 years, not a good sign. Same thing happened to Romo and it forced him to retire. It's not good when your QB has brittle collarbone syndrome. It's back to the cellar with the Bores and Kitties once Rodgers is done.

Rogers style will lead to injuries, same as Romo's. It will not matter if we cannot beat Philly, just where our playoff run will end. I thought the defense needed to improve this offseason, but that will probably not happen after signing Cousins.
Zimmer got schooled in the championship game. But bottom line was the Vikings needed more playmakers on defense.

We're 4-1 in the last 5 games against Green Bay. We don't play Aaron Rodgers, we play the Packers. It's not our fault they suck when they lose 1 player so why shouldn't those games count? They criticized us for how many years saying Adrian Peterson was our team photo, so talk about pot meet kettle lol.


No it's been enough to beat, humiliate Leslie Frazier and Brad Childress consistently, when the team was a disaster from top to bottom. Except oddly enough in 2009 when we added just 1 player and owned Green Bay. Since Zim has turned things around, especially the defense, I give the edge to us moving forward.


We beat Rodgers in Lambeau with Teddy Bridewater throwing left handed INT's with the division title on the line. The Pukers finished 10-6 with a healthy Rodgers. In 2016 they started 4-6 and finished 10-6 again. 4 and friggin 6 lol.

We went 13-3 last year. If Rodgers doesn't get hurt, we probably split the series and still finish 12-4. Do you see the Packers going 12-4 last year with Rodgers? They haven't gone 12-4 since 2014, and only once since 2011. They were 4-1 when we beat them in week 6, but they won 2 games on pure luck, got destroyed by Atlanta, and they barely beat Seattle in the opener, a team that struggled mightily last year.

The past doesn't matter though, I think we're the best team right now, and our future looks brighter than the Packers. As a team, they were exposed for who they really are without 1 player, just like they were in 2013. It's unbelievable how they let it happen again. Nobody in that organization should still have a job. We lost our starting QB and RB and still went 13-3 with Case friggin Keenum and Latavius Murray. Meathead 2.0 Mike McCarthy is holding that team back and I thank him for it.

Because when they have their starting QB and cornerstone of the franchise they consistantly dominate us. Great, we can beat a team with a third of their salary cap out of action. Want a cookie? Are we supposed to bank on that happening?

f*ck that, I want to be able to beat thise a$$holes at their very best, and not habe to rely and hope their starting QB goes down. Our record, and Zimmer's record against Rodgers is absolutely pathetic.

Yea, they could only beat Chilly and Frasier! Except when they beat Zimmer 4 out of the 6 times they played with their starting QB. Lol, what world are you living In?

Yes, we barely squeaked out a win against the struggling (By their standard) Packers on 2015 after getting a$$ blasted by double digits earlier that year. Fantastic. Then we saw then once again move farther into the postseason then us.

Are you really laughing at the Packers for a year where they went to the NFCCG? They started 4-6, ended 10-6 In the NFCCG, which only demonstrates how dangerous a threat they are with Rodgers on the field. Once again, Zimmer squeaked out a 7 point win, but then got was blasted by double digits in the second meeting.

"Won 2 games on pure luck" ok Reignman, do you see how f*cking silly this comment Is? Derp derp close games = pure luck, unless your the Vikings. Smh.

If we're the best team, how come we could only beat the Packers led by the worst QB in the league by 13 and 16 points? Its prettt clear we lose both of those if GB has Rodgers on the field.

Ok once again, Rodgers is the centerpiece of that franchise and the good majority of their cap space all by his lonesome. Of course losing him is going to have more effect then losing some backup like Sam, or a player on his rookie contract.

Yea, Mike McCarthy the SB winning coach who was brought in to (and did) succesfully build one of the best QBs in the game, along with year in year out a top offensive unit, is a 'meathead', but ole Zimmer who gets his f*cking a$$ handed to him on a plate by McCarthy nearly everytime they go agaimst each other unless GB has sitting on the bench, is so awesome. Lol smh guy.

Not sure why you blame McCarthy for what you clearly believe to be a personnel issue, but I doubt you understand why either.

In 2017, GB was 4-1 before losing Rodgers, in 2013, they were 5-2, are you seeing a trend here?

Once again people, whoopde f*cking do! We can beat GB if their starting QB and cornerstone of their franchise is sitting on the sideline. Want a f*cking ribbon?

My word we have a low standard of success. Smh

Source.

Our back up was as good as our starter, which isn't shocking considering he hardly took up more cap or costed more.

And how does that compare to league average?