Post by wivikesfan on Jan 9, 2024 20:41:17 GMT -6
The problem with your argument is, and I'm not knocking you for it, you have a high standard for what type of qb would be worth trading up for. So far you've mentioned guys who are borderline generational talents. Those guys always go 1st overall and everyone is salivating at the prospect of drafting them. You don't like giving up 1 extra 1st? It's gonna take 3 (or more) to get a team to move off a 1st overall generational qb, and even then it's still a 50/50 proposition that the guy will pan out. 60/40 at best.
I'd rather take multiple lesser risks than 1 massive risk that isn't double the likelihood of working out.
I would be okay trading lots of picks for generational talent. It would be justified. If your standard isn't high, then why should you give anything up? The quality should match the price. You shouldn't trade up just for the sake of it.
I agree quality should match price. But quality is ultimately based on likelihood of that player being a superstar. First, generational players are rare, and there might not be one next draft. Or the next. Or the next. You can't just wait forever.
And the price/return is off kilter when the compensation triples but the odds of getting a superstar doesn't triple.
I think we actually agree more than we disagree.