Post by dauntessmallhands on Feb 19, 2023 14:46:09 GMT -6
Why is that crazy? Teams find QBs as good or better than Kirk all the time.
all the time? on rookie contracts? that win super bowls on those rookie contracts?
how often do teams win the super bowl with their QB on a rookie contract? Brady, Roethlisberger in 2005(5th year), Eli in 2007(4th year), Wilson in 2013 (2nd year), Mahomes in 2019 (3rd year)
people are saying they want to move on from Kirk, but what they are really saying is that they want to move on from Kirk for the next Mahomes, Rodgers, Wilson, Allen or even Burrow. Yah. So would I. Just move on. Find an elite QB and we'll be back in business within a couple years. Sure, it can be done, but what are the odds?
They've got a very good QB that in all likelihood is going to have about a 23m cap hit in 2023 against a cap of 225m. That should be able to get it done.
What a lot of people are asking for, which is to roll out of Kirk and into a HOF QB over a two year period is just unrealistic.
It's probably also unrealistic to think that they can put together a super bowl contender with Kirk at the most important position.
The argument is about the odds either way. I think the latter is more realistic than the former, and the former is going to have to happen at some point so what's the harm to try the current way for a couple of years under the new regime?
Maybe you hit on that ideal scenario of drafting your QBOTF this year, take that one year of cap hit hell in 2024, and then you're really rolling again in year 3 of that rookie QB.