Retool or Rebuild for 2022?
Feb 7, 2022 9:15:32 GMT -6
PurpleKoolaid, Purple Pain, and 3 more like this
Post by Uncle on Feb 7, 2022 9:15:32 GMT -6
The "Kirk question" is very interesting because he would seemingly be a very good fit for the McVay/Shanahan pre-snap motion/play-action offense that McConnell would probably bring with him (Kirk is an effective play-action QB). But yet, it's difficult to build an entire team around him with his cap hit being the way it is, and kicking that cap down the road (even adding void years, which I loathe, BTW) is just a short-term bandaid with so many holes in the roster. There's always gonna be a roster hole or two, even on Super Bowl teams, but you want to try and minimize those holes to certain (less valuable) positions and we've got them on the interior of the OL and every level of the defense.
...and if you go the 2022 Draft route with a 1st Rd QB, there is recent evidence to support that at least one 1st Rd QB will turn into a solid QB. If you look back at the last 5 drafts (2017-2021), there's at least one solid QB that's been drafted in Rd 1:
1st Rd QB's drafted in last 5 drafts - bolded QB's have turned into solid pros:
2017: Trubisky, Mahomes, Watson
2018: Mayfield, Darnold, Allen, Rosen, Lamar
2019: K Murray, D Jones, D Haskins
2020: Burrow, Tua, Herbert, Love
2021: Lawrence, Wilson, Lance, Fields, Mac Jones (jury is probably still out on this class)
So if someone has the thought that least one of the five 2022 Round 1 QB prospects (Pickett, Coral, Willis, Howell, Ridder) will be a solid NFL starting QB, recent history does suggest that at least one or two of them will be just that...
...it's just that it's anyone's guess which one or two that will be at this point. No one has separated themselves from the pack to a large extent and each of them has some glaring issues that gives you pause from investing a 1st Rd pick in them.
I'm personally still in the camp of trading Kirk for maximum value (which could involve the Vikings "eating" an add'l $10m to make his 2022 salary more palatable for another team), drafting a QB in 2022 (probably 2nd Rd), signing a "bridge QB" and rolling with Mond, 2022 rookie and a bridge QB for the 2022 QB roster and then targeting someone really high in the 2023 Draft - pretty much how the Bills did it (1st year they just rolled w/ Tyrod Taylor in 2017, traded away bad contracts in 2017 to build up draft capital and then targeted and got their guy in the 2018 Draft).
Will that mean that some of the "stars" on our team won't be with the Vikes during that next "window"? Possibly yes. But you don't build a team around a WR...or LB...or DE...you build a team around a QB and that's never been more true than in 2022...and Kirk, with a large cap hit, isn't exactly the QB to build around, IMO.
Possibility 1 - Cousins is better than Mond / TBD Rookie / bridge option (I'll call this special, alternate player "Dandy Alt-man"). I'll assume with Cousins on the team the Vikings are a 9-8 team (2021 + 1 win from avoiding 1 game of Zimmer shenanigans), and without him, they're more like the 2021 Carolina Panthers at 5-12. In the scenario you suggested, Dandy Alt-man's contract will be ~$10M (I'll base Dandy Alt-man's contract on ... ohhh... sayy.. hypothetically... Andy Dalton's 2021 contract) + $10M Cousins Dead cap from 2020 + $10M that the Vikings eat of Cousins deal. That means the Vikings are saving at maximum, $15M. The Catch 22 is - There is no way they give up 4 wins for $15M and a pick (but for the sake of argument, let's say the do).
Possibility 2 - Cousins isn't that much better than Dandy Alt-man, so the Vikings win nearly as many games as they would with Cousins. In this case, the Vikings end up around 7-8 wins instead of 9. The catch 22 there is that if Cousins isn't much better, we won't get much in trade for him. 7-8 wins would put the Vikings in the pick #9-12 range in 2023; so to pick high in 2023 (pick #4-5) they would have to give up everything they get from trading Cousins + the 2023 1st + something else; and that only gets us to fringe top 5, probably not even the 1st QB off the board.
So in those two scenarios you are getting slightly worse to much worse performance for what amounts to a single 50/50 shot at the next QB. And I'd argue, this is also not where you want to be taking a shot at QB. Take the QB list you laid out and order them by pick (with the same highlighting):
1 - T. Lawrence
1 - J. Burrow
1 - K. Murray
1 - B. Mayfield
2 - Z. Wilson
2 - M. Trubisky
3 - T. Lance
3 - S. Darnold
5 - T. Tagovailoa
6 - J. Herbert
6 - D. Jones
7 - J . Allen
10 - J. Rosen
10 - P. Mahomes
11 - J. Fields
12 - D. Watson
15 - M. Jones
15 - D. Haskins
26 - J. Love
32 - L. Jackson
That top 5, but not #1 overall is a death trap for the QB position, that's where teams pick when they're desperate for a QB but don't have access to a supreme #1 overall talent.
Alternatively
Extending Cousins (3-4 years for this example) and using 2 mid 1st round picks (different drafts) on a QB somewhere between 2022 and the year after Cousins contract ends (as late as 2027 - after then end of a 4 year extension in 2026), would give the Vikings:
- Better odds of getting 1 good QB (2 x 50/50 chance) for less draft capital.
- No drop off in QB performance while they find the next QB, I'm not willing to throw a season away
- More cap money to spend in 2022 to improve the team right now.
- Replaces Cousins after his replacement is on the roster, not before, avoiding the desperation zone QB pick (this is important, the extension does not mean Cousins has to be the starter through 2026, the team still gets to move on from him as soon as they have a replacement).
- No one will trade for Cousins if he's a 7-9 win QB: Carson Wentz has a career record of 44-40-1 (thru 2021) and went 3-8-1 with Philly in 2020, but the Colts still traded for him. Matthew Stafford has a career record of 86-95-1 (thru 2021) and went 5-11 with Detroit in 2020, but the Rams traded for him. The only significant deterrent to trading for Cousins is the $35m base salary that another team would be taking on - mainly because Wentz & Stafford's base salaries were at least $10m+ less, which is why I have suggest the Vikings "eat" $10m of his 2022 base salary to make the trade more palatable.
- Top 5, but not #1 overall, is a death trap for QB prospects: agreed, but then look at where most of the bolded purple QB's were taken - anywhere from #6 thru #15, pretty much right where the Vikings would end up if they had 7-9 wins in 2022. And the Bills only traded two 2nd Rd picks to Tampa to move up from #12 to #7 in the 2018 Draft to get Josh Allen. And the Bills had a bunch of 2018 Draft Capital because they traded away players from the prior regime during 2017 to build that up while still making the playoffs with Tyrod Taylor (basically a "bridge QB"). I'm suggesting a similar plan for the Vikings in 2022.
- Extending Cousins would give more cap money in 2022 to improve the team right now: this early Jan 2022 CBS Sports article (link) had a take on extending Cousins and stated it would basically give the Vikings an add'l $20m in cap in 2022. The Vikings are approximately ($15m) over the cap at the moment (per OvertheCap - link) so extending Cousins basically allows the Vikings to get under the cap by the start of the league year and have enough to sign the 2022 Draft picks. You'd have to release and/or restructure other players to clear cap room to add pieces to the roster. Plus, that same CBS Sports article mentions that Cousins would surely expect a raise above the $33m avg per year salary he's making now, so much much cap would we save now and how much would he eat up in 2023+? Yes, the cap goes up from 2021, but so does Cousins salary and corresponding cap hits, which basically puts us in the same predicament we're in now: we're allocating too much cap resources on a player that doesn't give us that much in add'l wins.
- Using two, mid-1st Rd draft picks on QB's between 2022 and 2026: since an extension for Cousins would only increase his cap hit and yearly average (giving the Vikings less cap room to work with in free agency), the Vikings should look to the early rounds of the upcoming drafts in 2022/2023 to bolster the roster if they "hit" on those picks. But if we're taking up those early Rd draft picks with QB selections, then we aren't using them on other positions of need (C, RG, CB, DL, LB, S). Extending Cousins becomes a bit of a "damned-if-you-do" exercise, unless O'Connell and the rest of the offensive coaching staff somehow manages to get Kirk to play better than he has previously played - but in all seriousness, the QB that Kirk is after 10 seasons is pretty much the QB you're getting in 2022+.
Lastly, for the past 3 seasons (2019-2021), Kirk has taken up not one, but two roster spots on the 53-man roster because the prior coaching staff thought he needed Sean Mannion on the roster to prepare him for the upcoming games (seemingly because Zimmer and the rotating OC didn't have much of a relationship with him). We could assume that a new offensive staff headed by O'Connell would have a better relationship with Cousins, so much so that we wouldn't have a need to have a scouting/practice QB like Mannion on the roster specifically to prepare Kirk, but that remains to be seen.