Post by whoskmoon on Jun 18, 2021 8:17:04 GMT -6
I don't think it is out of the question this team could be top 5 talent in the NFC, but they are probably coming in last place in the NFC West if you switched them and AZ. Not good enough imo.
In Seattle Russ is a beast but his oline is questionable and I don't think the supporting cast on either side of the ball is better.
Walk me through your logic on that one?
To me, not surprisingly, it all lies on the oline (and health, but that's every team). If Darrisaw is close to Reiff, Davis is an upgrade to Dozier and Ezra takes a step forward, this offense is set even if Bradbury doesn't improve. If he does improve, even modestly, at pass protection look out.
See my take above on SF.
LAR have a better Oline, as good receivers, a better QB, and a better coached offensive scheme. They also have the better D.
We have never beaten Seattle under Zimmer have we? Their WRs are as good as ours, their RB is pretty good and they are better by a mile at the most important position on the offense. I honestly can't say one way or the other if their Oline is better or worse than ours. Do they have 4 guys who have never had a successful season in the NFL starting like we do? Defensively we are probably better, but not enough where Seattle doesn't sweep us.