Post by Jor-El on Apr 2, 2021 11:02:16 GMT -6
Ppl comparing Tom Brady to Kirk in anything is just comical. But lets also remember Tom is what 45 years old? He has nothing left to prove all he is playing for is more rings so yes why wouldn't he take less money lol Brady is in a different situation than anyone else its just not even comparable by any means. Owners dont care about these players financials why should the players ? If Kirk is still on the Vikings at 40 years old and trying to chase a ring, he would do the same thing because that would be the only thing he is still playing for. Im not saying I would've extended Kirk again last year, but to say Kirks contract is the reason we arent winning is just false.
It's not really worth comparing other players to him IMO.