Vikes Disappoint Against Dallas - Who Gets Deflated Ball?

I don't think the argument is whether the calls were correct or not (many weren't), the argument is about fairness. #37 of the Cowboys committed 2 very obvious and blatant personal fouls on both of our early fumbles. His helmet to helmet on Kirk is what caused the fumble, they even reviewed the play, and upheld the fumble. I know you can't call penalties on a review, but that just tells you how stupid the rule is. We're constantly told how everything is reviewable about a play once it's actually reviewed, so how does a ref look at the video and not realize it was a missed penalty that caused the turnover? He didn't have to say the play was overturned because of the penalty they missed, he could have overturned it for whatever reason. Inconclusive evidence, forward progress had been stopped, in the grasp etc. Anything to get the call right. They constantly blow plays dead where a QB clearly fumbles. I've even heard an official call it, "giving himself up", which apparently makes the play dead.

Then #37 speared Cook, who was a defenseless receiver, which jarred the ball loose for another questionable fumble. I think he's the same guy who speared Thielen on another play too. Why weren't any of those called, but then Harrison Smith got called for his, even though it was clear he led with a shoulder? More importantly, why wasn't #37 ever DQ'd?

Then we had a block in the back on the punt return team. When has that ever happened? A receiver who got called for facemasking on a stiff arm, which happens about 30 times a game, and chop blocking on Dozier when Bradberry had nothing but his sleeve touching the defender, and a holding call on the DL. So you're telling me the eagle eye refs were calling every ticky tack thing against us by the letter of the law, but the very disciplined Cowboys only had a single off side penalty until mid way through the 4th quarter? And this just a week after the Bears only had a single 5 yard penalty against us too?