Post by vikecycle on Nov 1, 2020 11:31:53 GMT -6
So, because Bradys teams are significantly better despite his play being lesser then Rodgers, you are just going to arbitrarily credit Brady for his teams superior cast? Um.... why? How is Bradys inferior play raising his supporting casts play more then Rodgers superior play? That doesn't make any sense lol.
Yes. Brady has 6 rings because his supporting casts have been better. What arent you understanding here? He plays WORSE in the REGULAR and PLAYOFFS by far then Rodgers. How does Brady playing worse help his team more then Rodgers playing better? It doesnt, it CAN'T, that doesn't make any f*cking sense lmao XD.
Yes. GB hasn't gone as far in the playoffs because their teams (aside from QB play) are significantly worse. Stay with me here chief lol. It certainly isbt due to Brady, whos playoff numbers pale in comparison to Rodgers at EVERYTHING.
No, the stats tell the whole story on the two individual players, the Championships (and cheating) tell the story on the overall teams. We don't judge players by how good there team is, we judge them by how good the PLAYER is.
How would Rodgers significantly superior regular and postseason play hinder NE's SB chances? Answer the question.
Bradshaw isnt better the Marino. Just stop. This is silly nonsense. We know Rodgers would have gotten the Pats as many, likely MORE rings, because he, you know... PLAYS BETTER in both the regular and postseason. By far.
Imagine thinking that we judge individual players by how good their team is rather then how good they (the individual players) actually play lol. I KNOW brady has more rings, because his TEAM was better. Bradshaw has more rings then Marino, Peyton etc. Is he better then all those guys too??? Oh well jee, why not?
If you honestly think Bradshaw is tied for the second best QB of all time, i really dont know what to tell you lol. Being on the best teams doesnt make you the best player over other players who destroy you production wise.
As to the Cheatriots without Brady, umm.... who has had more success? Bradys backups or Rodgers? Matt Cassel, Jimmy Garrapolo, Jacoby Brisset vs Matt Flynn and Brett Hundley lol.
Wow man, get emotional much?
If I had to guess, which it’s simply a guess, 80% of all sports announcers, analysts, or any reporting authority in the NFL will say that Tom Brady is the best QB to step on the field, ever. Period and end of story.
With that said, you keep on telling me that the Pats have always had the superior team over GB, stating that you're girl Erin has been hindered by a lack of supporting cast? I’d love to see your proof of this...
I’ve continued to watch Erin regress over the years, silly mistakes, stupid play, attitude problems, lack of leadership and quite frankly, an arrogance level that is seriously unmatched. You want to talk about QB that had no supporting cast, Peyton Manning, that is a man that had it rough....
I said nothing about Bradshaw, but you want to talk about teams that we’re “loaded”, the Steelers were. I don’t necessarily put Wes Welker, Julian Edelman, Amandola in the same category as I would put Swan, Stallworth, Antonio Brown for that matter..
Perhaps Erin did it to herself? She pretty much ran the best coach they’ve had, outside of Holmgrem, out of town. Maybe Erin just didn’t perform at a high enough level to get it done, she is a diva ya know.
You want to know what makes champions? The ability to overcome obstacles. You’re right about one thing though, it takes a TEAM to win a championship, but it takes a leader to guide that team. I’ve NEVER seen Erin have the same fire in her eyes as Brady has, EVER. Maybe that’s on her....
As far as the comparison of Bradshaw to Marino? You’re right, Marino was hands down better, on paper.... You see, Danni was a diva too, so it’s fitting that with all the fuc king talent she had, she never won it all either.. imagine that..
If you cannot hold a conversation w/o insults and all your emotional rhetoric, then don’t bother conversing with me moving forward. As far as your man crush on Erin and your overall love for the packers, take your as$ to the GB forum and go fuc k off with the rest of the GB homers. b*tch.
Not only do I disagree with that, ahat does it matter? Your now saying that players are to be judged by what announcers say about them, rather then their actual on field production? The madness never ends. XD lol
Okay, look at Aaron Rodgers team defenses compared to Bradys. Go ahead. I'll wait.
Aaron Rodgers regressed over the years? Hmm, funny, not only is he having a great year this year, but his 2018 and 2019 (the third and fourth worst seasons of his career) are BETTER than over HALF of Bradys career seasons (better TD to INT ratio and rating). See? Thats the problem with not caring about a players statistical on field production (and therefore not caring about reality), you ignorantly walk yourself right into completely proving my point. LOL
Silly mistakes? Um... you are aware his INT% is much lower then Bradys right? Stupid play? Odd considering his TD%, passer rating, and TD to INT ratio are much better then Bradys. See how easily the actual ON FIELD production refutes everything you say? This is why you should base your opinions in reality lol.
Lack of leadership? Arrogance? Thats subjective, but feel free to point out what you are reffering too. I think Rodgers had alot of tolerance for the way GB fans treated him behind Favre, and he seems to be embracing the role of mentor for Jordan Love right now, all in all, hes not perfect, but hes MUCH closer to it in the field then Brady, what with the whole being better at everything in every context thing.
Ran GB's best coach outside of Holmgren out of town? Uhhh.... im pretty sure Lombardi wasnt ran out of town by Aaron Rodgers lol, and moving on from McCarthy has worked out pretty well for them so far. I mean, Lafleur is off to one of the best starts in history.
Actually, Peyton had higher ranked average defenses than Rodgers too. Swing and a miss chief. Lol
Yes, you said nothing about Bradshaw, but you implicitly have to believe hes at least tied for second best QB of all time, you know, rings right? XD good to see you accidentally backpedaling on your ridiculously stupid rationale though.
Yes, the Steelers were loaded and thats why Bradshaw has 4 SB rings despite his numbers not even remotely being the best... are you starting to catch on now buddy? XD
Aaron Rodgers hurt his own SB chances by playing significantly better than Brady (and every other QB in history for that matter) in the regular and and postseason? Ummm.... how does that work? How does playing better hurt Rodgers chances but playing worse helps Bradys? Does oxygen make you drown? Does gravity make you float? LOL
Yes, and Aaron Rodgers overcomes his inferior supporting cast to put up much better on field play then Brady, thank you for proving my point. Brady plays worse with more around him, WHILE also cheating. Thats quite a far cry from overcoming obstacles, sounds more like a verifiably inferior player, playing verifiably inferior football, on a verifiably superior team. (While cheating)
'Fire in the eyes', is subjective nonsense, but at any rate, what good is it doing Brady if even with his fiery eyes, he still is playing worse then Rodgers in both the regular and postseason? It doesn't look from his on field numbers like its doing him much good, at least compared to Rodgers lol. Now if by, 'fire in the eyes', you actually mean significantly better teams and cheating, then yes, Brady definitely has that lol.
Okay, so even though Marino was a better player, Bradshaw was better because he played on significantly better teams? Bruh, you were supposed to see how silly your rationale is when you read the Bradshaw-Marino comparison, instead, you double down on your willfull ignorance lol. Being on the better team, does NOT make you a better player. Imagine reading this numerous times and just not responding because you dont have anything to say lol.
Did you just... did you just tell me that I cant conversate with insults and emotional rhetoric, immediately prior to telling me to f*ck off and calling me a b*tch? I think you literally just succeeded in trolling yourself lol.
... and neither is this Chris guy.
