Post by Purple Pain on Aug 3, 2020 12:40:42 GMT -6
Turnovers
The most random type of turnovers are fumbles, which are almost completely luck-based in terms of who recovers them. Last year, the Vikings were fifth in the league in turnover margin at plus-11 (31 takeaways, 20 giveaways). A big part of that was their fumble recovery rates on both offense and defense. Defensively, the Vikings recovered 14 of their opponents' 22 fumbles for a rate of 63.6 percent, which was third-highest in the NFL. On offense, the Vikings recovered 17 of their 29 fumbles for a rate of 58.6 percent (10th-highest). Regression could be coming in the fumble department this year.
Personnel changes also support the idea that the Vikings could face regression in their turnover differential. Not having Stefon Diggs will hurt Kirk Cousins on offense, and the losses of Everson Griffen, Linval Joseph, and three cornerbacks could lead to fewer takeaways on defense.
Personnel changes also support the idea that the Vikings could face regression in their turnover differential. Not having Stefon Diggs will hurt Kirk Cousins on offense, and the losses of Everson Griffen, Linval Joseph, and three cornerbacks could lead to fewer takeaways on defense.
Kirk Cousins
A big reason for the Vikings' success last year was Cousins putting together the best season of his career. In his fifth year as a full-time starter, Cousins was finally put in a system tailored to his strengths and responded by changing some of the narratives surrounding his career. He finished fourth in the league in passer rating and sixth in PFF grade, among other statistical achievements.
The fact that he had a career year, in itself, is a potential signal of regression, as is the departure of Diggs. But there are also a few specific statistical areas which suggest that he could have a difficult time replicating his 2019 performance. Cousins relied somewhat heavily on having success after lengthy dropbacks; you may recall some of his deep bombs to Diggs after rolling out to the left. PFF's Timo Riske found that Cousins had 34 percent of his passes fall below the 25th time-to-throw percentile and was highly successful on those attempts. "Successful targets that late aren’t something a team should rely on, and if teams have been able to rely on them, they might be due for regression," Riske wrote.
PFF's Eric Eager also notes that Cousins' success under pressure might not be sustainable. "Cousins’ career season — and his efficiency in noisy situations like play action and under pressure (sixth in the NFL in passer rating under duress) — all scream 'regression' when staring down the barrel of a weakened receiving corps, defense and a more difficult schedule."
Lastly, Cousins was incredibly efficient on third down, which he may have a hard time sustaining without Diggs.
The fact that he had a career year, in itself, is a potential signal of regression, as is the departure of Diggs. But there are also a few specific statistical areas which suggest that he could have a difficult time replicating his 2019 performance. Cousins relied somewhat heavily on having success after lengthy dropbacks; you may recall some of his deep bombs to Diggs after rolling out to the left. PFF's Timo Riske found that Cousins had 34 percent of his passes fall below the 25th time-to-throw percentile and was highly successful on those attempts. "Successful targets that late aren’t something a team should rely on, and if teams have been able to rely on them, they might be due for regression," Riske wrote.
PFF's Eric Eager also notes that Cousins' success under pressure might not be sustainable. "Cousins’ career season — and his efficiency in noisy situations like play action and under pressure (sixth in the NFL in passer rating under duress) — all scream 'regression' when staring down the barrel of a weakened receiving corps, defense and a more difficult schedule."
Lastly, Cousins was incredibly efficient on third down, which he may have a hard time sustaining without Diggs.
Opposing Quarterbacks
Another thing pointed out by PFF's Eager is how lucky the Vikings got in terms of some of the quarterbacks they faced last year. They only faced Matthew Stafford once, avoided Patrick Mahomes, and faced a bunch of inexperienced or backup-caliber signal-callers. Chase Daniel, Daniel Jones, Case Keenum, Dwayne Haskins, Matt Moore, Brandon Allen, and David Blough all played significant snaps against the Vikings' defense in 2019. When the Vikings did face top-tier QBs, they struggled.
While their defense did finish in the top 10 in terms of yards per play allowed and top five in points allowed, they were dragged up and down the field when forced to play Matthew Stafford (433 yards allowed), Dak Prescott (443 yards) and Russell Wilson (444 yards), and they had no answer for the ground game of the eventual NFC champion 49ers in Santa Clara in January.
In 2020, the Vikings' list of probable starting quarterbacks faced includes Stafford (twice), Aaron Rodgers (twice), Wilson, Prescott, Matt Ryan, Deshaun Watson, Philip Rivers, Tom Brady, Drew Brees and 2019 NFL passing leader Ryan Tannehill.
While their defense did finish in the top 10 in terms of yards per play allowed and top five in points allowed, they were dragged up and down the field when forced to play Matthew Stafford (433 yards allowed), Dak Prescott (443 yards) and Russell Wilson (444 yards), and they had no answer for the ground game of the eventual NFC champion 49ers in Santa Clara in January.
In 2020, the Vikings' list of probable starting quarterbacks faced includes Stafford (twice), Aaron Rodgers (twice), Wilson, Prescott, Matt Ryan, Deshaun Watson, Philip Rivers, Tom Brady, Drew Brees and 2019 NFL passing leader Ryan Tannehill.