Post by VikingsBoss on Apr 10, 2017 17:30:36 GMT -6
Apr 10, 2017 17:21:52 GMT -6 @oj said:
Barring injury, which one of those guys will be taking the snap in game one? Hoyer? Maybe? How do you think San Francisco fares in 2017? You throw out six backup quality quarterbacks as examples that a team doesn't have to overpay. And while that may still hold true...neither Sam Bradford nor Teddy Bridgewater will be starting for the Vikings in 2018 for $9 million.
If Sam Bradford is signed to an extension (which I think is a no-brainer), you're probably talking 4 years at $65-70 million. If you pick up the option on Bridgewater, he gets nearly $12-which is the basement for his next deal if he's your starter.
So, arguing over which craptatastic QB you'd rather pay $5 million to, is kind of ridiculous when you can be arguing over which slightly above average QB you want to give $15-18. Neither option precludes drafting a QB this year, but with one, you're praying your fifth-round pick is a diamond in the rough. With the other, you're pleasantly surprised when/if he becomes a solid backup whom some team pays $8 million when he becomes a free agent...
I already said if you're giving Bradford an extension you should pay him right in the range of your 4 years 65-70 mil suggestion. My point was to not overpay Bradford because you won't have the necessary money to put the pieces around him that he needs to win a Super Bowl.
And I am saying, in far too many words perhaps, what's the point of arguing over hypothetical bad QBs when we have two decent ones who pose their own conundrum?