Vikings Sack The Kitties ... Who Gets The Game Ball?

That's not fake news, that's just good old fashion laziness. I haven't updated my data to include 2017 or 2018 yet. Didn't need to, my point was to debunk the 2007 fake news, which I did thoroughly.


Well good on them, but I'm talking to the delusional homers who think the reincarnation of the '85 Bears are back and wearing purple.


It matters when a bunch of homers think our defense is good all of a sudden. You'll be whining when we play the Bears and can't sack Biscuit. Boo hoo, where'd our awesome defense go? It didn't go anywhere, it never existed. How many times did the 4 No-shows of the Apocalypse sack Drew Brees again? Here's a hint, it's a lot like 10 in that it ends in ZERO.


For this week yes, but I sure as hell ain't letting it get my hopes up like you sorry sack of suckers. How's the weather up there in hopes up land anyway?


LOL it's like you haven't paid attention to any of my posts. We could have trotted Ray Edwards, Chris Hovan, Stalin Colinet, and Kenechi Udeze out there and they would have recorded 10 sacks too. Some of us stayed back here in reality and saw what really happened. I'll be surprised if we record a total of 10 sacks in the last 7 games combined. The 3 straight games against Green Bay, New England, and Seattle will be ZERO, book it.

Nah, you just misunderstood me. lol. It wasn't fake news at all, my favorite lil Trumpkin.



So, Stafford just forgot how to play? Really? That's all it was? 
















I'm somewhere in between a delusional homer and a cynical nutjob, but ... sacks, "coverage sacks", no Golden Tate ... I do not care. The z-fense played well yesterday, and they deserve a lot of credit. That's my final answer. 

I'll welcome criticism towards the offense, though. Because that side of the ball is really frustrating to me. 

P.S. Brees rarely gets sacked, so you need to quit whining. But, again, we could have won that game had the offense played well.

I don't understand what happened to the Lions O-line... sure, LT Decker missed some plays, but they were a pretty good unit before getting beat up. Yes, Stafford held on to the ball too long, but there was more to it than that.

You can keep posting all the delusional homer stats you can find, but every bit of it points to the same piece of evidence. Stafford. We'll find out soon enough. I'm preparing myself for a trip back to reality, and you homers are back on the 4 Norseman of the Apocalypse bandwagon, just as you were after the 49ers game lol. Which strangely didn't last long. Only one of us can end up disappointed. And this just one week after failing to sniff Drew Brees' jock strap even once. How many times did the 4 No Shows sack Goff when he carved us up for 465 yards and 5 TD's? Barr can't get beat over and over by WR's if the 4 No Shows do their job. You're right, it wasn't Stafford and it wasn't related to him missing Tate.


Sometimes it's as simple as the QB having a bad day and holding onto the ball too long. Brees wasn't holding onto the ball for 10 seconds and we couldn't touch him, Stafford was and we sacked him 10 times. The evidence is all there. 2.89 seconds per sack, and that's how much time Stafford had to throw when the league average is 2.5 from snap to release. In 2016 Cam Newton held onto the ball too long and we sacked him 8 times. And yes that's probably the case with most 10 sack games by any team. But with a D-line as talented as ours, we should be able to sack a QB 8 times the normal way, or at least generate a great deal of pressure, but it can't, even against an average O-line. The only way our front 4 can generate pressure is if the other team has a mash unit at OL or the QB holds the ball all day. Otherwise they disappear. We won't be playing those kinds of teams in the playoffs. The 4 No Shows have a combined ZERO sacks against the only 2 playoff caliber teams we've played so far. And last time I checked, we won't be facing Stafford, Darnold, or Rosen in the playoffs.

How else do you explain how they can tally ZERO sacks one week and 10 the next? They must have ate all their Wheaties last week. They're way too inconsistent for me to give them too much credit. Get back to me when they start having these kinds of games on the regular, and I don't necessarily mean tallying a franchise record 10 sacks, all I'm asking for is consistent pressure, kinda like what our opponents constantly do to us, and by pressure I mean within that 2.5 second window, not the misleading 3 second window that the rest of these homers are going by. Michael Thomas and Cooper Kupp will already have the ball by 3 seconds.