Post by Oracle Bone Diviner on Nov 6, 2014 12:59:59 GMT -6
6 game suspension is what I'm expecting. The photos can't be unleaked, and this time, the NFL can't claim they didn't see them.
The question come in with the photo's. "Does the NFL use illegally obtained information?" That is what you have to ask. The leaking of the photos' and the GJ testimony was illegal. The NFL put's itself on a slippery slope if it does. It means that in the future, if other players are put in front of a grand jury, an their testimony is leaked the NFL would have to use it. As well, it puts Peterson at a disadvantage because there is no proof that came from the Grand Jury and he could argue that it is not true. You can't prove it unless someone testifies to the information being correct. And I don't think anyone is going to do that in this case. All he has to do is tell the NFL, prove those are pictures of my son. They can't.
I think you're making it more complicated than it is. I'm pretty sure he has already admitted the photos are of his son, more or less. And I don't think the NFL has to link justification of it's decision directly to the pictures. I also don't think its to his advantage to do anything except take what the NFL hands out. It will further mar his already damaged legacy. But speculation is easy at this point, its all we have.